An unvaccinated Canadian father has lost his right to see his three kids because the judge says one of those kids is immunocompromised.
So we’re still playing this silly game that unvaccinated people can’t catch and then pass on COVID.
The judge engages in complete misinformation, saying the health risks to the 10-year-old immunocompromised child made the decision necessary.
The parents separated in 2019 and agreed to share custody of their three children.
The judge wrote that the dad’s vaccination status poses a serious risk to the children.
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation reports:
“Their mother asked the court for a change to the custody agreement ending the father's in-person access. She applied to the court last year and the hearing took place Jan. 24.
"As the parents who are caring for [the child] 50 per cent of the time, in close quarters, unmasked and unvaccinated, they are well-positioned to transmit the virus to [the child] should they contract it, this despite their best efforts," the ruling says.
"It is no contest: the current science in the face of a highly contagious virus far outweighs Mr. F.'s layman wait-and-see approach."
The parents and the children are not named in the 26-page court ruling. They are only identified by initials.
The new order allows the father "generous" visiting rights via Zoom but no in-person contact. If he gets vaccinated, he can return to court to ask for a change to the decision.
While waiting for the hearing, the father also refused to consent to the children being vaccinated after they became eligible last November. Godbout ruled the mother could get that done without his agreement.
Fredericton lawyer Grant Ogilvie, who represented the mother in the case, said the three children have already received their first doses of vaccine since the ruling on Monday.””
Again, getting the jab DOESN’T stop the transmission of COVID.